Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Citroen Dispatch 2010: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 50 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2010 Citroen Dispatch were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Drive shaft joints and boots (front).

Summary

The 2010 Citroen Dispatch follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 1,711 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
50 in every 100
Did not pass first time
50 in every 100852 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
15 yearsabout 138,141 miles
First tests counted
1,711

What failed most often

  1. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)27 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)19 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Suspension arm ball joint (front)14 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2010 Citroen Dispatch vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Brakes

One fault: brake pedal, 5.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 845 of 852 failed first attempts (99.2%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Brake pedal

Failed on 21 first tests5.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A brake pedal rubber worn smooth is not a defect, and nor is a worn design pattern on an aftermarket rubber. A pedal with no rubber is rejected if its grooves or raised grip sections are worn smooth, unless the vehicle was made without them. Insufficient reserve travel is Major, but a vehicle is failed for it only if the pedal or lever is touching the floor or handlebar.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Body and structure

Two faults. The strongest is the drive shaft joints and boots (front): 4.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 225 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Exhaust system

Failed on 42 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Exhaust fumes causing a danger to health of persons on board are graded Dangerous, and so is a silencer likely to become detached. Fumes entering the cabin are Major. One or more missing or defective mountings does not necessarily make the exhaust insecure, since testers assess the overall security of the system.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the rear fog light: 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Rear fog light

Failed on 37 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing obligatory rear fog lamp, one that is not working, or one that does not emit a steady red light is graded Major. A rear fog lamp adversely affected by the operation of any other lamp is Major too. The manual allows it to go out when main beam is switched on or when dipped beam headlamps are switched off.

Individual direction indicators (rear)

Failed on 45 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 42 first tests, 2.9 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen wipers, 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen wipers

Failed on 45 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Only a clearly damaged or worn windscreen wiper needs to be rejected. A wiper that is missing or not working is graded Major, and so is a blade that is missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen. A defective blade is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Noted on 26 first tests9.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar pins and bushes (front)

Noted on 26 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Brake light

Noted on 27 first tests4.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Engine oil leaks (front)

Noted on 273 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Transmission oil leaks

Noted on 23 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Seat belt condition (front)

Noted on 22 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
50in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
11in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
39in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 50.2% of 1,711 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 60.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 11 fixed and the 39 not fixed make the 50 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005201020152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200443 in every 100382
200547 in every 100519
200647 in every 100696
200751 in every 1001,228
200849 in every 1001,451
200949 in every 1001,257
2010 This car50 in every 1001,711
201150 in every 1001,659
201251 in every 1001,550
201353 in every 1002,238
201450 in every 1002,979
201550 in every 1003,773
201652 in every 1003,382
201767 in every 1004,102
201869 in every 1004,090
201970 in every 1003,943
202075 in every 1002,800
202169 in every 1002,931
202269 in every 1003,755

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2010 Citroen Dispatch follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Drive shaft joints and boots (front), about 27 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 50.2% of 1,711 first MOTs on the 2010 Citroen Dispatch passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 60.6%. Among 852 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Brake pedal appears more often than on similar cars (2.5% of those tests; 21 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2010 Citroen Dispatch at the first attempt were Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (26.6%), Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (19.4%) and Suspension arm ball joint (front) (13.8%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Brake pedal (2.5% of those tests; 21 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Brake pedal shows up more often than on similar cars (2.5% of those tests; 21 observed failures; about 5.4× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2010 Citroen Dispatch include Brake pedal, Drive shaft joints and boots (front), Rear fog light. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Citroen Dispatch (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check