Citroen C4 2008: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 46 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2008 Citroen C4 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Individual sidelight or tail light (front).

Summary

The 2008 Citroen C4 follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 4,812 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
46 in every 100
Did not pass first time
54 in every 1002,595 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
17 yearsabout 104,841 miles
First tests counted
4,812

What failed most often

  1. Individual sidelight or tail light (front)21 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Drive shaft joints and boots (front)13 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Brake light11 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2008 Citroen C4 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Body and structure

Three faults. The strongest is the vehicle structure condition (front): 6.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,586 of 2,595 failed first attempts (99.7%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Vehicle structure condition (front)

Failed on 71 first tests6.0 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

Structure that is fractured, deformed, corroded, modified or inadequately repaired is failed on rigidity only if the overall structural rigidity of the vehicle is significantly reduced. Structure that is likely to affect steering or braking adversely is graded Dangerous. Prescribed areas are not covered here, as they are checked under other sections, including brakes and steering.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 41 first tests, 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Chassis condition (front)

Failed on 67 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A main load-bearing structural member that is fractured, deformed, modified or inadequately repaired is Major when structural rigidity is significantly reduced, and Dangerous where steering or braking is likely to be adversely affected. Corrosion of the body, cab or chassis at a mounting point is Dangerous where overall security or stability is impaired.

Drive shaft joints and boots (front)

Failed on 344 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A constant velocity boot that is only severely deteriorated is Minor. It is Major once it is missing, split or insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt. A transmission joint excessively worn is Major, and graded Dangerous when it is so worn it is likely to fail.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: seat belt mounting area (front), 5.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Seat belt mounting area (front)

Failed on 61 first tests5.6 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision is graded Dangerous. The load bearing structure near an anchorage, called a prescribed area, is Major when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Anchorage points are inspected for all seat belts fitted, except a belt with no corresponding seat.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Suspension

One fault: suspension mounting area (front), 4.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Suspension mounting area (front)

Failed on 76 first tests4.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

The load bearing structure within a set distance of a sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting is a prescribed area. Major applies when its strength or continuity is significantly reduced or it is inadequately repaired. Dangerous applies when it is so weakened that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 33 first tests, 2.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Noise, emissions and leaks

Two faults. The strongest is the diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008): 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Diesel emissions test (pre-reg turbo rules before 01/07/2008)

Failed on 55 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Diesel emissions test (compression-ignition rules for vehicles from 01/07/2008)

Failed on 67 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault and one wear pattern. The strongest is the headlight aim not tested (front): 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Headlight aim not tested (front)

Failed on 24 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Headlamp aim recorded as not tested, or unable to be tested, is a Major failure. These results must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified before starting. The reason must be included in the additional information box.

Brake light

Failed on 295 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

All stop lamps missing or not working is graded Dangerous, and so is a stop lamp that stays on when the brakes are released. A stop lamp that is missing or not working is Major. On some vehicles with LED rear lamps, part of the stop lamp can go out when the rear fog lamp is lit, which is not regarded as a defect.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joints (front)

Noted on 112 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Track rod end

Noted on 22 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
46in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
44in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 46.1% of 4,812 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 55.8%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 44 not fixed make the 54 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel2,859112,538 miles4647
Petrol1,95194,851 miles4645

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

4060801002005200820152020Older carsNewer cars
40608010020082020Newer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200554 in every 100617
200650 in every 1001,235
200749 in every 1003,668
2008 This car46 in every 1004,812
200948 in every 1003,669
201046 in every 1004,635
201153 in every 1005,770
201254 in every 1007,285
201354 in every 10010,925
201456 in every 10018,913
201560 in every 10025,465
201662 in every 10015,965
201767 in every 100836
201873 in every 1002,576
201977 in every 1004,766
202084 in every 1001,641
202179 in every 1006,040
202283 in every 1007,742

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2008 Citroen C4.

Of 2008 Citroen C4 vehicles with under 78,000 miles, 54 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 133,000 miles or more, 42 in every 100 did.

Under 78,000971 tests
54
78,000–97,000962 tests
47
97,000–114,000 Typical car965 tests
43
114,000–133,000932 tests
44
133,000 and over964 tests
42

What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 78,00097,000–114,000133,000 and over
Individual sidelight or tail light (front)7.212.211.8
Drive shaft joints and boots (front)5.77.29.1
Brake light4.96.46.7
Headlight aim4.06.07.6
Coil spring (front)5.04.95.7

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

19in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

60in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

13in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2008 Citroen C4 follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Individual sidelight or tail light (front), about 21 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 46.1% of 4,812 first MOTs on the 2008 Citroen C4 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 55.8%. Among 2,595 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Vehicle structure condition (front) appears more often than on similar cars (2.7% of those tests; 71 observed failures; about 6.0× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2008 Citroen C4 at the first attempt were Individual sidelight or tail light (front) (21.0%), Drive shaft joints and boots (front) (13.3%) and Brake light (11.4%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Vehicle structure condition (front) (2.7% of those tests; 71 observed failures; about 6.0× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Vehicle structure condition (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (2.7% of those tests; 71 observed failures; about 6.0× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2008 Citroen C4 include Vehicle structure condition (front), Seat belt mounting area (front), Chassis condition (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2008 Citroen C4 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check