Citroen C3 2002: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 47 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2002 Citroen C3 were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Headlight aim.

Summary

With 638 first tests, there are too few to say whether the 2002 Citroen C3 differs from the model years either side.

At a glance

How 638 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
47 in every 100
Did not pass first time
53 in every 100341 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
23 yearsabout 85,006 miles
First tests counted
638

What failed most often

  1. Headlight aim15 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2002 Citroen C3 vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Lamps and electrical

Two faults. The strongest is the individual direction indicators (front): 4.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 339 of 341 failed first attempts (99.4%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Individual direction indicators (front)

Failed on 27 first tests4.8 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Direction indicators must be amber, though vehicles first used before a set date may have white at the front and red at the rear when the indicators are combined with stop or position lamps, and sequential or dynamic ones are not a reason to fail. A lamp that is missing, inoperative or has more than half of a multiple light source not functioning is graded Major. A flashing rate outside the permitted range is graded Minor.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 26 first tests, 5.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Side repeater indicators

Failed on 22 first tests4.6 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Sequential or dynamic direction indicators are not a reason to fail. Where a side repeater is required, it is allowed to be part of the front direction indicator if it has a marked wraparound lens, or an amber light coming through the front lens when viewed from a set distance to the side of the rear bumper. A lens defect with no effect on the emitted light is Minor, and one that adversely affects the light is Major.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 27 first tests, 16 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front): 3.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 29 first tests3.2 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 24 first tests2.9 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Shock absorbers (rear)

Noted on 22 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
47in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
10in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
43in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 46.6% of 638 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 56.6%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 10 fixed and the 43 not fixed make the 53 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020022005201020152020
406080100200220102020

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 50 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
2002 This car47 in every 100638
200349 in every 1001,848
200450 in every 1002,335
200550 in every 1002,950
200652 in every 1003,522
200751 in every 1004,080
200850 in every 1003,871
200949 in every 1007,881
201051 in every 10015,915
201153 in every 10013,749
201255 in every 10013,621
201358 in every 10012,592
201461 in every 10013,132
201565 in every 10011,645
201667 in every 1008,425
201771 in every 10014,789
201876 in every 10014,697
201981 in every 10012,988
202087 in every 1007,568
202189 in every 1007,941
202292 in every 1006,874

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

With 638 first tests, there are too few to say whether the 2002 Citroen C3 differs from the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Headlight aim, about 15 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 46.6% of 638 first MOTs on the 2002 Citroen C3 passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 56.6%. Among 341 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Individual direction indicators (front) appears more often than on similar cars (8.0% of those tests; 27 observed failures; about 4.8× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2002 Citroen C3 at the first attempt were Headlight aim (15.3%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Individual direction indicators (front) (8.0% of those tests; 27 observed failures; about 4.8× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Individual direction indicators (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (8.0% of those tests; 27 observed failures; about 4.8× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2002 Citroen C3 include Individual direction indicators (front), Side repeater indicators, Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2002 Citroen C3 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check