BMW 5 Series 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 69 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2007 BMW 5 Series were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Track rod end (front).

Summary

The 2007 BMW 5 Series follows the pattern of the model years either side.

At a glance

How 6,531 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
69 in every 100
Did not pass first time
31 in every 1002,007 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
18 yearsabout 157,600 miles
First tests counted
6,531

What failed most often

  1. Track rod end (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)11 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre condition (rear)10 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2007 BMW 5 Series vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

Two faults. The strongest is the suspension arm ball joint (rear): 60 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 2,003 of 2,007 failed first attempts (99.8%) that recorded an odometer reading in 2025. Mileage is needed to compare like with like.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm ball joint (rear)

Failed on 91 first tests60 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A suspension arm ball joint is failed under the general suspension pin, bush or joint wording. Excessively worn is Major, and likely to become detached is graded Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 89 first tests, 39 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)

Failed on 189 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated is Minor. It becomes Major once it is missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, so what matters is whether it still keeps dirt out. DVSA words this for any suspension joint dust cover, and files it here under anti-roll bars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the flexible brake hoses (rear): 8.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Flexible brake hoses (rear)

Failed on 159 first tests8.5 times as often as similar carsStrong evidence

What it means

Testers reject a flexible brake hose for being excessively damaged or chafed only if it is severe enough to expose the reinforcement. Slight damage, chafing or twisting is graded Minor. A leak is graded Dangerous on a hydraulic braking system and Major on an air system, and a hose damaged and likely to fail is also Dangerous.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 148 first tests, 2.8 times as often as on similar cars.

Handbrake lever

Failed on 46 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism that is obviously worn is graded Minor. It is Major when worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release, and also when the ratchet is not holding correctly. A lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 21 first tests, 4.6 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 2.5 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 172 first tests2.5 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Road wheels

One fault: wheel fixings (front), 2.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Wheel fixings (front)

Failed on 44 first tests2.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Wheel nuts, bolts and studs are the fixings that attach the road wheel. A wheel with a loose or missing wheel nut, bolt or stud is Major. If more than one is loose or missing, it is graded Dangerous.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Steering

One fault: track rod end (front), 2.1 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end (front)

Failed on 220 first tests2.1 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Advisories

Other things testers noted as worn or close to failing, more often than on similar cars.

An advisory is a note from the tester about something that has not failed yet. It is an early warning, not a fail. Advisories for the faults above are shown with those faults.

Anti-roll bar (front)

Noted on 23 first tests5.1 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Suspension arm pins and bushes (rear)

Noted on 311 first tests4.7 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Anti-roll bar (rear)

Noted on 39 first tests2.8 times as often as similar carsElevated evidence

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Counts cover advisories recorded on failed first tests only, compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
69in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
5in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
26in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 69.3% of 6,531 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 74.4%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 5 fixed and the 26 not fixed make the 31 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Diesel5,746162,597 miles6869
Petrol784117,255 miles7572

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002007201020152020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000200720102020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
199765 in every 100342
199865 in every 100644
199964 in every 100773
200067 in every 100909
200167 in every 1001,344
200267 in every 1001,907
200365 in every 1001,975
200468 in every 1002,213
200569 in every 1003,566
200668 in every 1005,221
2007 This car69 in every 1006,531
200872 in every 1005,692
200971 in every 1006,190
201073 in every 1007,321
201175 in every 10010,398
201273 in every 10012,639
201376 in every 10013,282
201481 in every 10014,992
201583 in every 10015,867
201685 in every 10014,582
201784 in every 10014,034
201886 in every 10017,248
201987 in every 10014,339
202088 in every 1007,890
202187 in every 1005,362
202286 in every 1006,182

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage makes a modest difference on a 2007 BMW 5 Series.

Of 2007 BMW 5 Series vehicles with under 120,000 miles, 74 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 196,000 miles or more, 66 in every 100 did.

Under 120,0001,307 tests
74
120,000–146,0001,280 tests
69
146,000–169,000 Typical car1,315 tests
70
169,000–196,0001,330 tests
68
196,000 and over1,288 tests
66

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Diesel162,597 miles6869
Petrol117,255 miles7572

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 162,597 against 117,255). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 120,000146,000–169,000196,000 and over
Track rod end (front)2.33.13.3
Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test)1.53.44.1
Tyre condition (rear)3.13.33.6
Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover (front)4.12.82.3
Tyre tread depth (rear)1.72.73.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

29in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

46in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

9in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

The 2007 BMW 5 Series follows the pattern of the model years either side. Its main cause of failure was Track rod end (front), about 11 in every 100 failed tests. In 2025, 69.3% of 6,531 first MOTs on the 2007 BMW 5 Series passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 74.4%. Among 2,007 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Flexible brake hoses (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (7.9% of those tests; 159 observed failures; about 8.5× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2007 BMW 5 Series at the first attempt were Track rod end (front) (11.0%), Handbrake efficiency below minimum (roller test) (10.9%) and Tyre condition (rear) (10.1%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Flexible brake hoses (rear) (7.9% of those tests; 159 observed failures; about 8.5× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Flexible brake hoses (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (7.9% of those tests; 159 observed failures; about 8.5× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 BMW 5 Series include Flexible brake hoses (rear), Suspension arm ball joint (rear), Handbrake lever. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2007 BMW 5 Series (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check