Audi TT 2014: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 81 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2014 Audi TT were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Tyre condition (front).

Summary

A 2014 Audi TT passed first time about 2 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2013 and 2015 model years.

At a glance

How 3,781 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
81 in every 100
Did not pass first time
19 in every 100718 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
11 yearsabout 69,419 miles
First tests counted
3,781

What failed most often

  1. Tyre condition (front)11 in every 100 failed tests
  2. Anti-lock braking system (ABS)8 in every 100 failed tests
  3. Tyre tread depth (front)8 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2014 Audi TT vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. A wear pattern follows age and use more than the way the car was built. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: suspension arm (rear), 21 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 718 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Suspension arm (rear)

Failed on 45 first tests21 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a suspension arm. A component that is fractured, missing or likely to fail is graded Dangerous, and one excessively damaged or corroded is Major. On some vehicles, some highly stressed parts are thin pressed steel, and many of those have hollow box sections or up-facing areas that can collect road dirt and salt, so they get special attention.

Also noted as an advisory

Testers also noted it as an advisory, worn but not yet failing, on 96 first tests, 11 times as often as on similar cars.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage. Advisories count notes recorded on failed first tests only.

Brakes

Two faults. The strongest is the anti-lock braking system (ABS): 7.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Anti-lock braking system (ABS)

Failed on 59 first tests7.3 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

ABS is failed as removed only where it has obviously been removed, because not every vehicle in the age range where removal is not permitted has ABS. A warning lamp that does not light or shows an ABS fault is Major, as is a missing or excessively damaged wheel speed sensor. Every failure row for this component is Major.

Electronic stability control

Failed on 38 first tests6.4 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

An ESC warning lamp is failed only when the tester is certain it indicates an ESC malfunction, because the lamp takes various forms and the owner's handbook may need checking. The system is also called ESP, VDC or DSC, among many other names. Every failure row is Major, covering the lamp, wheel speed sensors, wiring, other components and the switch.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Lamps and electrical

One fault: individual sidelight or tail light (rear), 2.7 times as often as on similar cars.

Individual sidelight or tail light (rear)

Failed on 28 first tests2.7 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A position lamp showing red light to the front or white light to the rear is Major. Rear lamps must show a steady red light, and front ones can show white, predominantly white with a blue tinge, or yellow if combined in a yellow headlamp. With a multiple light source, up to half not working is Minor and more than half is Major.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Seat belts and restraints

One fault: airbag warning light, 2.4 times as often as on similar cars.

Airbag warning light

Failed on 20 first tests2.4 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

The airbag warning lamp (SRS MIL in DVSA's wording) is failed only if it indicates a system malfunction, which is Major. A lamp lit to show the passenger airbag is disabled is not to be regarded as a defect. Dashboard messages are not a defect in their own right, though they can help the tester confirm a malfunction.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Tyres

One wear pattern: tyre tread depth (rear), 2.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Tyre tread depth (rear)

Failed on 41 first tests2.2 times as often as similar carsWear pattern

What it means

Only primary grooves count when tread depth is assessed: those holding the wear indicators, or cut as deep as those when new. Shallower secondary grooves are ignored. Tread depth below the minimum for the vehicle is Dangerous, and so is a pattern not visible over the whole tread, but that second row applies only to vehicles that need the lower minimum.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Visibility

One fault: windscreen wipers, 2.0 times as often as on similar cars.

Windscreen wipers

Failed on 40 first tests2.0 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

Only a clearly damaged or worn windscreen wiper needs to be rejected. A wiper that is missing or not working is graded Major, and so is a blade that is missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen. A defective blade is graded Minor.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
81in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
3in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
16in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 81.0% of 3,781 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 84.3%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 3 fixed and the 16 not fixed make the 19 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Petrol and diesel

First testsTypical mileagePassed first time, as testedPassed first time, same mileage
Petrol2,48964,727 miles8382
Diesel1,29279,296 miles7779

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Cars with more miles usually fail more often, so the same-mileage figure gives every fuel the mileage mix of all the cars in this year.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020002005201020142020Older carsNewer cars
4060801002000201020142020Older carsNewer cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 82 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200061 in every 1001,374
200160 in every 1002,149
200260 in every 1003,272
200360 in every 1003,830
200461 in every 1003,905
200561 in every 1003,106
200660 in every 1002,550
200765 in every 1007,101
200868 in every 1006,518
200971 in every 1005,533
201071 in every 1006,044
201175 in every 1006,029
201281 in every 1005,350
201382 in every 1006,077
2014 This car81 in every 1003,781
201585 in every 1008,229
201687 in every 1008,819
201788 in every 1007,149
201889 in every 1003,934
201991 in every 1004,450
202092 in every 1002,875
202192 in every 1002,357
202292 in every 1002,500

If you are buying one

What this year's MOT record means for the decision in front of you.

Mileage matters most on a 2014 Audi TT.

Of 2014 Audi TT vehicles with under 49,000 miles, 89 in every 100 passed their 2025 MOT first time. With 93,000 miles or more, 72 in every 100 did.

Under 49,000765 tests
89
49,000–63,000744 tests
84
63,000–77,000 Typical car780 tests
81
77,000–93,000745 tests
79
93,000 and over747 tests
72

Petrol or diesel?

Typical mileagePassed first time,
as tested
Passed first time,
same mileage
Petrol64,727 miles8382
Diesel79,296 miles7779

Figures are in every 100 first tests. Petrol cars look better on the raw figures only because diesel cars have done more miles (typically 79,296 against 64,727). At the same mileage there is no clear difference between the two.


What to check at your mileage

How often each fault turned up on a failed first test, by the car's mileage. Read it as: what is likely to need looking at on a car like the one in front of you.

Under 49,00063,000–77,00093,000 and over
Tyre condition (front)1.72.12.5
Anti-lock braking system (ABS)1.72.41.3
Tyre tread depth (front)0.51.22.9

Faults per 100 first tests, by the car's mileage at the test.


When a car fails

51in every 100

of failed cars had one item to fix.

19in every 100

of failed cars had three or more items to fix.

6in every 100

of all first tests had a defect the tester marked dangerous (unsafe to drive away).


Every figure here is a first-attempt MOT rate from DVSA open data for this model line, for cars of this model year tested in 2025. Each mileage band holds a fifth of the tests. MOTs do not test engine or gearbox internals, so this is a pre-purchase checklist, not a full reliability score.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

A 2014 Audi TT passed first time about 2 in every 100 less often than the average of the 2013 and 2015 model years. In 2025, 81.0% of 3,781 first MOTs on the 2014 Audi TT passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 84.3%. Among 718 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Suspension arm (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (6.3% of those tests; 45 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2014 Audi TT at the first attempt were Tyre condition (front) (10.6%), Anti-lock braking system (ABS) (8.2%) and Tyre tread depth (front) (7.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Suspension arm (rear) (6.3% of those tests; 45 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Suspension arm (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (6.3% of those tests; 45 observed failures; about 21× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2014 Audi TT include Suspension arm (rear), Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Electronic stability control. These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2014 Audi TT (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check