Model Reports 4 min read Updated 18 Oct 2026

Alfa Romeo Mito 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

In 2025, 68 in every 100 first MOTs on a 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito were passes. Most common reason for a fail: Coil spring (front).

Summary

With 692 first tests, there are too few to say whether the 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito differs from the model years either side. Treat the faults below as a checklist.

At a glance

How 692 first tests went in 2025.

Passed first time
68 in every 100
Did not pass first time
32 in every 100221 failed first-attempt tests
The typical car
8 yearsabout 48,776 miles
First tests counted
692

What failed most often

  1. Coil spring (front)32 in every 100 failed tests

How we count this. Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Only Class 4 cars on their first MOT of the year are counted. A car that fails and is fixed at the test station still counts as a fail in the first-attempt rate. These are raw results, not adjusted for age, mileage, or peer mix. The MOT does not test engine or gearbox internals.

Note:

These are patterns across 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito vehicles in 2025, not a prediction that any one car will have them. Faults are grouped by part of the car. They come from MOT defect codes, not manufacturer bulletins, recalls or a diagnosis of any one car.

Suspension

One fault: coil spring (front), 6.2 times as often as on similar cars.

Figures below are measured across the 221 failed first attempts in 2025 that had a mileage recorded, which allows a like-for-like comparison.

We only list faults with at least 20 failures and a rate of about 2.0 times that of similar cars, which keeps one-off results out of the list.

Coil spring (front)

Failed on 70 first tests6.2 times as often as similar carsLikely evidence

What it means

A missing bump stop rubber is not a reason to fail a coil spring. When the vehicle is jacked and lowered, a spring that does not correctly locate as the suspension returns to its normal running position is rejected as insecurely attached. A missing spring is Major, and graded Dangerous where directional control is affected.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

Steering

One fault: track rod end (front), 4.3 times as often as on similar cars.

Track rod end (front)

Failed on 29 first tests4.3 times as often as similar carsPossible evidence

What it means

A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play is Major, and one worn to the extent there is a serious risk of detachment is graded Dangerous. A dust cover that is damaged but still keeps dirt out is Minor, and one missing or no longer keeping dirt out is Major. Testers must tell wear from a joint's built-in clearance or spring loading.

Data: UK MOT open data, 2025. Compared with cars of the same age and mileage.

MOT pass rates

How first tests ended, and how the pass rates are counted.

Passed first time
68in every 100
Passed on the first test.
Fixed at the station
4in every 100
Failed, then fixed at the test station the same day.
Failed
28in every 100
Did not pass, and were not fixed at the test station.

First-attempt pass 68.1% of 692 first tests (2025): only cars that passed first time count. Official-style pass 71.7%: cars fixed at the test station also count as a pass. The 4 fixed and the 28 not fixed make the 32 in every 100 that did not pass first time.

Same model, other years

Passed first time in every 100, all tested in 2025.

40608010020102017Older carsNewer cars
40608010020102017Older cars

Newer cars are younger, so look for a jump rather than the climb. A year earlier (2024), when these cars were a year younger, 70 in every 100 passed first time.

YearPassed first timeFirst tests
200954 in every 1002,741
201058 in every 1002,523
201158 in every 1002,298
201262 in every 1001,928
201360 in every 1001,460
201462 in every 1001,512
201561 in every 1001,436
201667 in every 1001,381
2017 This car68 in every 100692
201872 in every 100385

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

With 692 first tests, there are too few to say whether the 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito differs from the model years either side. Treat the faults below as a checklist. In 2025, 68.1% of 692 first MOTs on the 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito passed first time (PRS: items fixed at the station the same day, counted as a fail). The official-style rate including PRS is 71.7%. Among 221 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Coil spring (front) appears more often than on similar cars (31.7% of those tests; 70 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). There is no single reliability score here; this is a pre-purchase checklist built from DVSA open data, not a guarantee for any individual car.
Ranked by how often they were actually recorded, the items that most often failed a 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito at the first attempt were Coil spring (front) (31.7%), each as a share of the year's failed first attempts. That is what goes wrong most often on the car. The common faults table shows a different measure: faults that are unusual compared with similar cars.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Coil spring (front) (31.7% of those tests; 70 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Coil spring (front) shows up more often than on similar cars (31.7% of those tests; 70 observed failures; about 6.2× more often than similar cars). That does not prove a design fault. Age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase checkpoint, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito include Coil spring (front), Track rod end (front). These are the faults that stand out compared with similar cars, not a complete list of what can go wrong on any individual car.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Alfa Romeo Mito (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics, not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars, not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics; this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces, but does not remove, differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • If the data for a car is too thin to say anything useful, we say so rather than guess.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Check any vehicle’s MOT history

Full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle.

Run a free check