Peugeot Expert 2007: reliability & common MOT faults

Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Peugeot Expert include Component mounting prescribed areas (~5.8× peers) and Prescribed areas (~5.7× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (763 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.

Key takeaways before you buy

  • Component mounting prescribed areas: about 5.8× more often than similar cars
  • Prescribed areas: about 5.7× more often than similar cars
  • Prescribed areas (front): about 5.5× more often than similar cars

Common faults

These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).

Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.

Based on 763 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.

Component mounting prescribed areas

This failure pattern appears about 5.8× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 23 failed first-attempt tests; 3.0% of failed tests for this model year.

Any · 23 failures · ×5.8 vs similar cars · 3.0% of failed first tests · Possible elevated fault

Prescribed areas

This failure pattern appears about 5.7× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 33 failed first-attempt tests; 4.3% of failed tests for this model year.

Any · 33 failures · ×5.7 vs similar cars · 4.3% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

# Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
1 Component mounting prescribed areas
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
Any 23 ×5.8 3.0% Possible elevated fault
2 Prescribed areas
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Prescribed areas
Any 33 ×5.7 4.3% Likely common fault pattern
3 Prescribed areas (front)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Prescribed areas
Front 25 ×5.5 3.3% Possible elevated fault
4 Component mounting prescribed areas (front)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
Front 37 ×4.5 4.8% Likely common fault pattern
5 Drive shafts — Joints
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Drive shafts > Joints
Any 23 ×4.3 3.0% Possible elevated fault
6 Individual direction indicators (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
Rear 57 ×3.7 7.5% Likely common fault pattern
7 Rear fog lamp (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp
Rear 27 ×3.5 3.5% Possible elevated fault
8 Drive shafts — Joints (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Drive shafts > Joints
Front 153 ×2.7 20.1% Possible elevated fault
9 Rear fog lamp
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp
Any 33 ×2.7 4.3% Possible elevated fault
10 Component mounting prescribed areas (rear)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
Rear 86 ×2.5 11.3% Possible elevated fault

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).

Advisories

Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

# Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
1 Component mounting prescribed areas (front)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
Front 55 ×10.8 7.2% Likely common fault pattern
2 Other components
Steering > Power steering > Other components
Any 27 ×7.5 3.5% Elevated vs peers
3 Stop lamp
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Stop lamp
Any 28 ×3.8 3.7% Elevated vs peers
4 Seat belts — Condition (front)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Condition
Front 30 ×2.8 3.9% Elevated vs peers
5 Individual direction indicators (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
Rear 28 ×2.7 3.7% Likely common fault pattern
6 Integral vehicle structure condition
Body, chassis, structure > Integral vehicle structure > Integral vehicle structure condition
Any 21 ×2.1 2.8% Elevated vs peers
7 Exhaust system (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Exhaust system
Rear 43 ×2.0 5.6% Elevated vs peers
8 Ball joint (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Ball joint
Front 43 ×2.0 5.6% Elevated vs peers

FAQs

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2007 Peugeot Expert on this page. Among 763 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Component mounting prescribed areas appears more often than on similar peer cars (about 5.8× more often than peers; 23 observed failures; 3.0% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.
Among failed first-attempt tests we surface patterns that appear more often than on similar peer cars. Top example: Component mounting prescribed areas (about 5.8× more often than peers; 23 observed failures; 3.0% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Component mounting prescribed areas shows up more often than on similar peer cars (about 5.8× more often than peers; 23 observed failures; 3.0% of failed tests). That does not prove a causal design fault — age, mileage, and usage still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer TSB.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2007 Peugeot Expert include Component mounting prescribed areas, Prescribed areas, Prescribed areas (front). These are elevated versus similar peer cars where lift clears our floors — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that look elevated versus peers among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2007 Peugeot Expert (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are ranked against similar age and mileage peers. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer TSB list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.

PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).

Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.

Limitations.

  • MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
  • Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.

Display rules config: 1

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.