Ford Fiesta 2004: reliability & common MOT faults

Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2004 Ford Fiesta include Swivel pins and bushes (rear) (~16.1× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (7,279 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.

Key takeaways before you buy

  • Swivel pins and bushes (rear): about 16.1× more often than similar cars

Common faults

These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).

Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.

Based on 7,279 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.

Swivel pins and bushes (rear)

This failure pattern appears about 16.1× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 215 failed first-attempt tests; 3.0% of failed tests for this model year.

Rear · 215 failures · ×16.1 vs similar cars · 3.0% of failed first tests · Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars

# Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
1 Swivel pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Axles > Swivel pins and bushes
Rear 215 ×16.1 3.0% Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars
2 Ball joint dust cover (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Ball joint dust cover
Front 546 ×3.4 7.5% Likely common fault pattern
3 Rigid brake pipes (front)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
Front 427 ×2.6 5.9% Possible elevated fault
4 Wheel bearings (rear)
Suspension > Wheel bearings
Rear 253 ×2.6 3.5% Possible elevated fault
5 Rigid brake pipes (rear)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
Rear 602 ×2.3 8.3% Possible elevated fault
6 Individual direction indicators (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
Front 258 ×2.2 3.5% Possible elevated fault
7 Stop lamp
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Stop lamp
Any 841 ×2.1 11.6% Possible elevated fault
8 Shock absorbers (rear)
Suspension > Shock absorbers
Rear 300 ×2.1 4.1% Possible elevated fault

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).

Wear patterns

These patterns look like wear or usage effects rather than model-specific design faults. Tyres, brake friction material, and alignment-related defects often track mileage and road use. They are not treated as a model design fault in our common-faults ranking.

# Pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
1 Tyres — Size/type (front)
Tyres > Size/type
Front 36 ×2.4 0.5% Wear / usage pattern — not treated as a model design fault

Advisories

Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

# Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
1 Swivel pins and bushes
Suspension > Axles > Swivel pins and bushes
Any 36 ×10.4 0.5% Elevated vs peers
2 Road Wheels — Condition
Road Wheels > Condition
Any 21 ×10.3 0.3% Elevated vs peers
3 Road Wheels — Condition (rear)
Road Wheels > Condition
Rear 249 ×5.7 3.4% Elevated vs peers
4 Swivel pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Axles > Swivel pins and bushes
Rear 348 ×5.5 4.8% Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars
5 Road Wheels — Condition (front)
Road Wheels > Condition
Front 359 ×5.2 4.9% Possible elevated fault
6 Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage
Front 27 ×4.6 0.4% Elevated vs peers
7 Pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Sub-frames > Pins and bushes
Rear 116 ×3.7 1.6% Likely common fault pattern
8 Pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Other suspension component > Pins and bushes
Rear 46 ×3.5 0.6% Possible elevated fault

FAQs

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2004 Ford Fiesta on this page. Among 7,279 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Swivel pins and bushes (rear) appears more often than on similar peer cars (about 16.1× more often than peers; 215 observed failures; 3.0% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.
Among failed first-attempt tests we surface patterns that appear more often than on similar peer cars. Top example: Swivel pins and bushes (rear) (about 16.1× more often than peers; 215 observed failures; 3.0% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Swivel pins and bushes (rear) shows up more often than on similar peer cars (about 16.1× more often than peers; 215 observed failures; 3.0% of failed tests). That does not prove a causal design fault — age, mileage, and usage still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer TSB.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2004 Ford Fiesta include Swivel pins and bushes (rear). These are elevated versus similar peer cars where lift clears our floors — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that look elevated versus peers among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2004 Ford Fiesta (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are ranked against similar age and mileage peers. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer TSB list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.

PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).

Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.

Limitations.

  • MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
  • Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.

Display rules config: 1

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.